Couldn't help it.... Got this new digital microscope & decided to get a sultry up close and personal shot of your operator.


Moles

It has been said in the electrolysis business for years that moles are very dangerous. Any irritation could lead the mole to become cancerous and it is for this reason that a doctor’s consent is often necessary so that any negative result can be carefully watched.

I must point out here that we are talking about the use of thermolysis on a mole. As most of the profession uses this type of process. RF energy such as that used in thermolysis is indeed, capable of causing severe reaction within the tissues of a mole.

What about MY process. Interestingly enough, I have been removing hairs from moles with absolutely no negative impact whatsoever.

I think this may be the case for two reasons.

  1. 1: Galvanic electrolysis has a very limited area of effect. It is largely confined to the root of the hair with a minimal and controllable effect on outside tissues.
  2. Most hair follicles actually grow UNDER the mole and not inside it. Most of the galvanic action actually takes place under the mole and therefore, has little effect on the tissues of the mole itself.

It has also been curious to note that the removal of several large hairs from under the mole has resulted in a noticeable shrinking of the mole as well. However, this can vary widely and no results are guaranteed. There. That keeps me out of trouble.